Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42144892›Full record

SynthesisAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2026

Auditory Sensitivity in Autism: A Systematic Review of Mismatch Negativity and Mismatch Field Responses.

Sara Cacciato-Salcedo, Shreya Jaokar, Neil J Ingham, Manuel S Malmierca, Marija M Petrinovic

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara Cacciato-SalcedoCognitive and Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory (CANELAB), Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla and Leon (INCYL), Calle Pintor Fernando Gallego, Salamanca, Spain.
Shreya JaokarDepartment of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Neil J InghamWolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, King's College London, London, UK.
Manuel S MalmiercaCognitive and Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory (CANELAB), Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla and Leon (INCYL), Calle Pintor Fernando Gallego, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-7572
Marija M PetrinovicDepartment of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0894-8424

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory mismatch responses-mismatch negativity (MMN) and mismatch fields (MMF)-are well established electrophysiological markers of automatic auditory discrimination supported by short-term sensory memory. These responses, typically elicited using passive oddball paradigms, are increasingly used to investigate sensory and language processing in autism. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 55 studies comparing MMN and MMF responses in autistic and typically developing (TD) individuals across childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. Using the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) framework, we identified consistent evidence for smaller MMN amplitudes and reduced MMF power in autistic children and adolescents relative to TD peers, particularly in response to frequency, duration, and speech-based deviants. Studies also frequently reported longer mismatch latencies in autistic participants and associated these delays with language difficulties and heightened auditory sensitivity. Although some studies reported age-related convergence in MMN and MMF measures between autistic and TD groups in later childhood or adolescence, greater right-hemisphere lateralization in autistic individuals emerged as a consistent finding across both speech and non-speech paradigms, suggesting differences in hemispheric weighting for auditory processing of linguistic and non-linguistic cues. To explain interindividual and developmental variability in mismatch responses, we propose a precision-weighted predictive coding account, in which divergent assignment of confidence to sensory prediction errors may contribute to autism-related differences. While study quality was generally fair, methodological heterogeneity, underrepresentation of females, and limited cross-cultural sampling constrain generalizability. Future research should prioritize longitudinal, sex-stratified, and culturally diverse designs, using standardized protocols and collaborative data practices. MMN and MMF responses hold promise as non-invasive translational biomarkers of early-stage sensory prediction and neurodevelopmental variation in autism.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionAutism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderEvoked Potentials, AuditoryAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultChildElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansautism spectrum disorder (ASD)electroencephalography (EEG)magnetoencephalography (MEG)mismatch fields (MMF)mismatch negativity (MMN)

Identifiers

PMID42144892
PMCPMC13377376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.