SynthesisJournal of paediatrics and child health2026
Systemic Therapy for Paediatric Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence and Limitations.
Synthesis in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe role of systemic therapy in paediatric Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) remains undefined. Management is primarily guided by observational data and variable practice patterns. This systematic review aims to integrate recent evidence and evaluate clinical outcomes associated with systemic therapies in paediatric SJS/TEN.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Scopus was conducted from January 1990 to February 2025. Studies were eligible if they included patients (< 18 years) with SJS, SJS-TEN overlap or TEN managed with supportive care alone or systemic therapy (corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), cyclosporin, TNF-α inhibitors or plasmapheresis). Studies without defined diagnoses or outcomes were excluded. Primary outcomes were mortality and length of hospital stay. Risk of bias was assessed using CARE guidelines for case reports and the Joanna-Briggs checklist for observational studies. Studies providing individual-level data were synthesised quantitatively, while aggregated data were described narratively.
resultsA total of 260 studies comprising 1608 paediatric patients met inclusion criteria. Most patients received systemic therapy, most commonly corticosteroids or IVIg. Systemic therapy was not associated with a shorter length of stay or reduced mortality rate compared to supportive care alone. Treatment with cyclosporin and TNF-α inhibitors trended towards lower mortality rates, and for cyclosporin, shorter length of stay. However, these findings did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsEvidence for systemic therapy remains limited by study heterogeneity and small sample sizes. Although emerging targeted therapies show early promise, firm conclusions regarding efficacy cannot be drawn. This highlights the need for further collaborative research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.