SynthesisPharmacology research & perspectives2026
Meta Analysis of DHA and EPA Supplementation on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Atrial Fibrillation Risk.
Synthesis in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain to impose a main global burden of morbidity and mortality despite advances in anticipation and treatment. Omega-3 fatty acids, mainly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have been extensively studied for potential cardioprotective effects, yet their impact on cardiovascular outcomes remains debated due to heterogeneity in formulation, dose, and patient subgroups. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of EPA and DHA supplementation on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and atrial fibrillation (AF), including postoperative AF (POAF), in patients with established CVD. A systematic search of Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 2010-December 2021) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of combined EPA + DHA supplementation in secondary prevention or perioperative settings. Data were synthesized using RevMan v5.3 with a random-effects model, and study quality was assessed via the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. From 3682 records, 25 RCTs (n = 25 578 patients) were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant reduction in MACE (effect estimate 0.042 ± 0.0499, Z = 0.850, 95% CI [-0.055, 0.140], p = 0.396; low heterogeneity) or AF/POAF incidence (trend toward reduction: -0.198 ± 0.1498, Z = -1.319, 95% CI [-0.491, 0.096], p = 0.187; modest heterogeneity). Neutral findings likely reflect moderate-dose combined EPA + DHA use, limited subgroup reporting on metabolic comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertriglyceridemia) or concomitant therapies (e.g., statins), and high background guideline-directed medical therapy reducing residual risk. Although omega-3 fatty acids exert anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and lipid-modulating effects, this analysis indicates no broad benefit in reducing MACE or AF risk with combined moderate-dose EPA + DHA in heterogeneous post-event populations. Recent evidence highlights more MACE reductions with high-dose purified EPA monotherapy in high-metabolic-risk subgroups, balanced against dose-dependent AF increases at high doses (> 1.5 g/day). Future large-scale RCTs should prioritize biomarker-verified compliance, metabolic/concomitant therapy stratification, and formulation-specific comparisons to define targeted therapeutic roles. Trial Registration: This study has been registered in PROSPERO, and the registration code is 642795.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.