ArticleHuman resources for health2026
Novel approaches to empowering health workforce: a scoping review.
Article in Human resources for health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe development of health workers is crucial for achieving national and global health objectives. This study aims to identify novel methods and approaches for empowering the health workforce through in-service training.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework in five steps. A comprehensive search was performed in three databases-PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus-using MeSH terms and keywords until December 4, 2022. The study utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to carry out the investigation and present the results.
resultsA total of 3257 articles were retrieved, of which 34 articles were included in the scoping review. The majority of the articles (n = 23, 68%) were published between 2018 and 2022, with physicians being the primary target group (n = 16, 47%). Most studies employed a combination of several methods, with simulation methods, virtual training, practical and field training, coaching, group interaction, flipped classrooms, case studies, peer experiences, teaching through surveys and research, small group training, and problem-solving approaches being the most commonly used strategies.
conclusionImplementing innovative training methods to empower healthcare personnel enhances skills, improves training effectiveness, and ultimately leads to better performance and the delivery of higher-quality healthcare services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.