ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2026
Predicting cardiovascular death in overweight/obese people with prediabetes using machine learning-a proof-of-concept study.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insulin Resistance Indices and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Middle-Aged and Older Adults with Prediabetes: A Machine Learning-Assisted Predictive Modeling Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals with prediabetes face an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications, which can ultimately lead to premature mortality. However, existing risk stratification tools are not targeted for people with prediabetes. We aimed to develop a simple explainable model to predict if a person will develop a fatal CV outcome or not among people with prediabetes.
methodsParticipants ≥ 45 years with prediabetes (HbA1c 39-47 mmol/mol (5.7-6.4%)) and established CV disease and overweight/obesity were included. A binary logistic regression model was trained to predict CV death using stratified threefold cross-validation. The model's risk estimates were calibrated, and the predictive capability was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), precision and recall.
resultsIn total 5636 participants with 182 (3.2%) CV deaths (mean time-to-event of 2.0 years) and a mean trial duration of 3.3 years were included. Seven easily collected demographic and clinical variables were selected for the model. Discrimination (ROC AUC) was acceptable at 0.730 (95% CI 0.659-0.801). Applying our prediabetes cohort on existing benchmark models developed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in a general and type 2 diabetes population without prior CVD, demonstrated lower performance for CV death (ROC AUC: 0.630 (SCORE2) and 0.643 (SCORE2-Diabetes)) compared to our model. Lower performance was also observed for predicting MACE in our cohort (ROC AUC: 0.596 and 0.603) using the established models compared to the original populations (ROC AUC: 0.739 and 0.66-0.73). No comparative models for people with prediabetes and prior CVD exists. Thus, even with the limitations in different populations and outcome targets, this indicates that prediabetes-specific prediction models could potentially improve early prevention in this high-risk population.
conclusionWe have developed a prediabetes-specific proof-of-concept model that predicts whether a person is at high risk of cardiovascular death. External validation of the model is crucial before adoption to a real-world setting to clarify whether the model generalizes beyond the studied population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.