ArticleBMC oral health2026
Root-oriented replantation with socket reconstruction as a regenerative strategy for periodontally hopeless teeth: a pilot feasibility report.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper describes a technique that the root-oriented replantation (ROR) of periodontally hopeless teeth (PHT) offers the preservation and restoration of tooth stability and function.
methodsPreoperative intraoral three-dimensional (3D) scans and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data were imported into the robotic system for virtual surgical planning. During the surgery, the PHT were atraumatically extracted. This was followed by extraoral root surface debridement and retrograde root canal therapy (retro-RCT). The robotic system precisely reconstructed the 3D morphology of the alveolar socket according to the preset planning. The treated teeth were replanted into the reconstructed socket and were stabilized by splinting them to the adjacent teeth. Regular postoperative follow-up was conducted to assess the clinical outcomes. See also the graphical abstract.
resultsRobotic-assisted socket reconstruction enabled precise positioning of the PHT. The postoperative outcomes demonstrated minimal pain and swelling. At the three-month follow-up, clinical indicators of inflammation showed significant improvement, with resolution of bleeding on probing and suppuration, and reduced probing depths. The teeth regained stability and were restored esthetically and functionally with veneer restoration.
conclusionsRobotic-assisted alveolar socket reconstruction and ROR provide an innovative and effective therapeutic strategy for the preservation of PHT. Intraoperatively, retro-RCT enforced a minimally invasive approach and resulted in a thorough root canal filling.
trial registrationChiGTR, the registration number is ChiCTR2300070948. Registered 27 April 2023 retrospectively registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.