ReviewClinical and translational science2026
Collaboration as a Catalyst for Advancing Rare Disease Research: The Experience of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) was established to improve diagnosis, treatment, and research collaboration across rare diseases through collaborative, multi-site, translational, and clinical research. Its governance framework promotes efficient data sharing and collaboration among research consortia, NIH representatives, and patient advocacy groups (PAGs). This infrastructure facilitates coordinated efforts to advance rare disease research through shared resources and communication. Prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on rare disease patients, the RDCRN recognized cross-consortia collaboration as a priority. Its policies promote data sharing while protecting participant confidentiality. PAGs participate in governance, study design, and regulatory discussions, helping to identify patient-relevant priorities, improve recruitment and retention, and strengthen trust between researchers and patients. Cross-consortia efforts have addressed challenges like biomarker identification and harmonization of clinical measures, leading to new methods and standardized data collection that benefit multiple rare diseases. Studies by teams focusing on different diseases have led to improved diagnostic tools by addressing overlapping disease presentations. The RDCRN offers scholars cross-consortia opportunities for presentations, competitions, and NIH training collaborations, fostering growth and networking. Network meetings promote exchange and process standardization; pilot projects facilitate independent grant submissions, forming a pipeline of skilled investigators. The RDCRN fosters trust, shared vision, and open communication by cultivating a culture of mutual respect, shared learning, and collective problem solving. By engaging a wide range of stakeholders, it has aligned its research with patient needs, advancing innovation. Its high-impact publications, effective mentoring programs, and pioneering cross-consortia initiatives underscore the value of collaboration in rare disease research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.