ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Simulation of apically grounded cochlear implant stimuli using neural stimulation models.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays typically do not extend along the entire cochlear duct, often resulting in poor stimulation of the most apical nerves. To better stimulate apical auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), previous studies have examined placing an isolated ground contact within the helicotrema, providing the ability to direct current apically. In this study, we utilize finite difference method (FDM) simulations and computational ANF models to study the effect of apical ground placement on apical ANF stimulation.
methodsHigh-resolution resistivity maps based on postoperative CT scans for 3 CI patients were used in FDM-based generation of cochlear voltage maps. Models corresponding to the use of a typical extracochlear ground and a helicotrema ground were used to drive ANF models, allowing for generation of activation thresholds at each of 75 modeled ANF bundles throughout the cochlea. Thresholds between the two models were compared to assess the effects of an apical grounding contact on improving apical ANF stimulation.
resultsIn all 3 patients, we observe a relative reduction in stimulation thresholds for apical ANFs when an apical ground is present as opposed to an extracochlear ground. Additionally, when an apical ground is used, we observe an increase in stimulation thresholds for more basal ANFs.
conclusionsApical ground contacts can increase activation of typically under-stimulated low frequency ANFs without the need for longer contact arrays, providing a solution for improving low frequency sound perception and potentially leading to better hearing quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42144535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.