Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42144505›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Robotic surgery in acute care, trauma, and critical care settings: a dual-dataset, data-driven bibliometric analysis of global research trends, emerging themes, and future directions.

Mohamed Amira Talib, Fahad Omar Alomary, Sulieman Alshuhri, Amal Alomran, Abdulaziz Alsahli, Abdulaziz Alshammari, Shaza Merghani Abdelrahman, Manal Ali Alhathli, Siddig Ibrahim Abdelwahab, Manal Mohamed Elhassan Taha

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed Amira TalibCollege of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad Omar AlomaryCollege of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sulieman AlshuhriCollege of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amal AlomranCollege of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AlsahliCollege of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AlshammariCollege of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shaza Merghani AbdelrahmanCollege of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Manal Ali AlhathliDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Science, Prince Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University (PNU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Siddig Ibrahim AbdelwahabHealth Research Centre, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. sadiqa@jazanu.edu.sa.
Manal Mohamed Elhassan TahaHealth Research Centre, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic technologies are increasingly explored in acute and emergency surgical contexts, offering potential advantages in precision, minimally invasive access, and perioperative management. Despite rapid growth, research addressing robotic acute care surgery (RACS) remains dispersed across specialties, methodological designs, and geographic regions. A comprehensive, data-driven synthesis of its intellectual structure, collaboration patterns, and thematic evolution has not been systematically undertaken. This study aimed to map global research activity in RACS, identify leading contributors, characterize dominant and emerging themes, and delineate conceptual transitions within the field.

methodsA bibliometric analysis was conducted using Scopus-indexed publications (1997-2025). Descriptive, collaboration, and thematic analyses were performed using Bibliometrix, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace to evaluate productivity trends, knowledge networks, thematic development, and emerging research fronts.

resultsA total of 1,172 publications demonstrated sustained growth, particularly after 2020. The United States, China, and Italy emerged as leading contributors, with Europe and North America accounting for the majority of productivity and citation impact. Collaboration networks revealed concentrated institutional hubs with relatively limited transnational integration. Bradford's Law identified a small core of specialized surgical journals responsible for approximately one-third of total output. Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlighted central themes around robot-assisted surgery, minimally invasive techniques, and perioperative outcomes, with bridging roles played by laparoscopy and comparative study designs. Thematic evolution analysis suggested a gradual shift from technology-focused foundations toward outcome-oriented evaluation, cost analysis, and acute-context applications. CiteSpace identified active research fronts in emergency surgery, risk assessment, propensity score matching, and randomized controlled trials, indicating increasing methodological sophistication.

conclusionResearch intersecting robotic surgery and acute care contexts has expanded substantially over the past decade, with growing emphasis on outcomes, comparative effectiveness, and economic evaluation. This study provides a structured intellectual and thematic framework, identifies gaps in international collaboration and high-level evidence generation, and outlines strategic directions for future multicenter and methodologically rigorous investigations.

Indexed as

BibliometricsCritical CareRobotic Surgical ProceduresAcute Care SurgeryHumansAcute care surgeryBibliometric analysisCitespaceRobotic surgeryVosviewer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.