ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Patient-reported outcome measures in lumbar disc herniation: a scoping review.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLumbar disc herniation (LDH) substantially compromises quality of life across physical, emotional, and social domains. Therefore, appropriate Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are essential to capture the challenges these patients face.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to identify and map the currently available PROMs used in adults with LDH, along with their characteristics and application in clinical research.
methodsWe followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for scoping reviews to guide our review process. We searched the following databases from inception to 12/26/2025: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Included studies addressed a PRO or PROM in LDH.
resultsThe 131 included studies primarily employed 23 distinct measurement tools, with physical function, pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) being the most frequently assessed core domains. The most commonly used tools were the ODI, VAS, and EQ-5D.
conclusionsUsing PROMs in patients with LDH remains a complex topic. Currently, a range of measurement tools are available, but consensus on their selection has not been reached. Future research should focus on standardizing tool selection criteria, conducting high-quality validation on the measurement properties of existing instruments, and developing an AI-powered electronic PROM toolkit to promote patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42144463What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.