ArticleScientific reports2026
M-CSF priming enhances the efficiency and reproducibility of hiPSC-derived osteoclast differentiation and pharmacological responsiveness to anti-resorptive agents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived osteoclasts offer a potentially scalable platform for studying osteoclast biology and anti-resorptive pharmacology. However, differentiation efficiency and inter-line reproducibility remain limited. To address this limitation, we investigated whether cytokine priming during the monocyte-to-macrophage transition is an important determinant of efficient and reproducible osteoclast differentiation from hiPSCs across diverse genetic backgrounds. Monocytes derived from three independent hiPSC lines were primed briefly with M-CSF, GM-CSF, or no cytokine, followed by osteoclast differentiation with M-CSF plus RANKL. Among these conditions, M-CSF priming reproducibly increased osteoclast differentiation efficiency compared with GM-CSF priming or no priming, yielding > 70% CD51/CD61⁺ cells across hiPSC lines derived from distinct tissue sources. Osteoclast maturation and function were then assessed by multinucleation, TRAP staining, and bone resorption assays, which further showed that M-CSF priming enhanced osteoclast maturation and resorptive function across the tested hiPSC lines. We also performed extracellular flux-based measurements of OCR/ECAR and ATP production rates to examine metabolic changes associated with osteoclast maturation. This analysis showed that an early rise in OXPHOS-derived ATP production preceded peak induction of mature osteoclast genes, suggesting that early oxidative metabolism may support subsequent fusion and functional maturation. Finally, we assessed the pharmacological responsiveness of hiPSC-derived osteoclasts using two clinically used bisphosphonates, alendronate and zoledronate, both of which elicited dose-dependent anti-osteoclastic effects. Collectively, these results indicate that brief M-CSF priming enhances the efficiency and inter-line reproducibility of hiPSC-derived osteoclast differentiation, while early oxidative metabolism temporally precedes osteoclast gene induction. This improved reproducibility and functional maturation may allow hiPSC-derived osteoclasts to support mechanistic studies of osteoclastogenesis and the evaluation of pharmacological responses to osteoclast-targeted agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.