ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
DNA methylation-based multi-tissue age prediction model for blood, saliva, and buccal swab samples.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation is regarded as the most promising biomarker for forensic age prediction. However, the vast majority of forensic age prediction tools based on DNA methylation reported so far are tissue-specific, which limits their practical applicability. In our previous study, we successfully developed a cross-tissue 10-CpG quantile regression model for age prediction from saliva and buccal swab samples, achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.45 years. In order to develop a more widely applicable multi-tissue age predictor, in this study, we further quantified DNA methylation at 18 CpG sites in 216 blood samples (Han Chinese, 1-82 years) using two multiplex methylation SNaPshot assays and systematically evaluated 16 model configurations-varying CpG marker panels, age transformation, and tissue variable inclusion-to identify markers with high cross-tissue stability and optimize predictive accuracy. An optimized 10-CpG quantile regression model constructed with 648 samples including 216 blood, 216 saliva, and 216 buccal swab samples achieved MAEs of 3.32 years (blood) and 3.88 years (combined dataset) in 10-fold cross-validation. Specifically, this model demonstrated excellent performance on an independent validation set of forensically relevant chewed gum samples (n = 25, aged 19-70 years; MAE = 2.82 years). Although its prediction accuracies in each sample type were slightly lower than those obtained from each tissue-specific model, the newly developed multi-tissue model would be extremely useful in forensic analysis, especially when dealing with biological samples of uncertain tissue origin or complex cell compositions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42144436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.