ArticleScientific reports2026
Parameterized quantum random number generators for superconducting quantum hardware: novel architectures and NIST SP 800-22 evaluation under IBM noisy simulators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantum Random Number Generators (QRNGs) exploit intrinsic quantum mechanical randomness and are promising candidates for higher-quality randomness than classical RNGs. However, QRNGs on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) platforms are constrained by decoherence, gate and measurement errors, and limited circuit depth, and the resulting impact on statistical randomness is not yet systematically characterized. This work introduces parameterized quantum random number generator (PQRNG) architectures built from parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) to improve tunability and expressive power under realistic noise. We study three architectures, PQC-H-CH, H-PQC-CH, and H-CH-PQC, and evaluate their randomness under Transpiler optimization and circuit-level error mitigation as preprocessing steps, using NIST SP 800-22 for statistical validation. Utilizing default NIST settings, PQC-H-CH attains the largest number of fully passing preprocessing configurations (126 combinations passing all 15 tests), compared with 110 for H-PQC-CH and 69 for H-CH-PQC, indicating strong robustness across Transpiler optimization and mitigation settings, and we find that preprocessing choices influence randomness quality more strongly than adjusting NIST test parameters. Overall, these results demonstrate that the proposed approach provides a solid foundation for developing more reliable and practical QRNGs using PQCs in NISQ devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.