ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2026
Anatomic Variations of the Zygomatic Arch: Rethinking the Indications for the Orbitozygomatic Approach.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporary zygomatic arch removal (zygomectomy) in the orbitozygomatic approach is sometimes used in surgeries involving complex lesions. Although the orbitozygomatic approach provides wider exposure than the pterional approach, it is more invasive and carries a higher risk of complications. We hypothesized that adequate exposure could be achieved without zygomectomy when the zygomatic arch lies well below the floor of the middle cranial fossa. This study introduces the concept of "Low-set Zygoma" and examines its clinical and anatomical relevance. High-resolution cranial computed tomography scans from 105 adults without craniofacial anomalies (210 sides) were analyzed to measure the vertical distance from the superior margin of the zygomatic arch to the middle cranial fossa floor (middle cranial fossa height). In this study, a Low-set Zygoma was defined as a middle cranial fossa height of ≥ -3.0 mm. Participants were stratified into 2 groups [Low-set Zygoma (≥ -3.0 mm) and non-Low-set Zygoma (< -3.0 mm) ], and demographic variables were assessed using univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. We performed 3 pterional approaches in patients with Low-set Zygoma, where orbitozygomatic approach was typically indicated. Adequate exposure was achieved in all patients, with no complications. Based on computed tomography data, the mean vertical distance from the zygomatic arch to the middle cranial fossa floor was -2.36 mm. Body height was the only independent predictor of a Low-set Zygoma (p = 0.037); individuals shorter than 162.5 cm were significantly more likely to exhibit this anatomical feature. A Low-set Zygoma appears to be a reliable anatomical indicator for avoiding unnecessary zygomectomy and may support more individualized preoperative planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.