ReviewJournal of inherited metabolic disease2026
Natural History of Morquio A Syndrome.
Review in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (Morquio A) is a progressive lysosomal disorder caused by a deficiency of N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfate sulfatase, resulting in the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans, primarily in cartilage and bone. The condition leads to skeletal dysplasia, impaired ossification, and growth imbalance, causing cervical compression, tracheal obstruction, hip dysplasia, and cardiopulmonary complications. Although existing natural history studies have clarified several aspects of disease progression, objective methods to quantify skeletal pathology and its functional impact remain limited. Standard endurance-based assessments, including the 6-min walk test, 3-min stair climb, and spirometry, are variable and infeasible for young children, wheelchair-dependent individuals, or patients with respiratory or postoperative limitations. Their dependence on motivation, training, and site-specific differences restricts their value as reliable endpoints. Significant gaps persist in the objective evaluation of skeletal dysplasia progression and its functional impact. There remains an unmet need for non-invasive, quantitative tools that capture multisystem involvement across the full phenotypic spectrum. Objective tools exist as we reported but have not been widely implemented or standardized, and data supporting their use as regulatory endpoints remain limited. Emerging longitudinal, multidisciplinary evaluations and surrogate biochemical biomarkers show potential to define disease severity, support prognosis, and serve as validated endpoints for therapeutic monitoring and surgical risk stratification. In conclusion, to address the limitations of prior studies, we propose a novel natural history program of innovative, non-invasive assessments based on our compiled data. Such approaches may contribute to more consistent longitudinal data and help inform the development of clinical endpoints for emerging therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.