ArticleBMJ global health2026
Sexual harassment and workplace safety among female doctors: the hidden toll in Sri Lanka.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionData on sexual harassment in medicine is limited in South Asia, and formal mechanisms for reporting and redress remain underdeveloped in the region. We aimed to describe workplace sexual harassment among female doctors, associated factors, survivor experiences and perceptions of physical and sexual safety in the workplace in Sri Lanka.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among Sri Lankan female doctors with at least 6 months of work experience. Data were collected using an anonymous online questionnaire from September to October 2024, administered via mailing lists of professional medical bodies and closed social media network groups of female doctors on Facebook and WhatsApp. We used SPSS V.23 for quantitative data analysis and narratively described free text responses in the sections titled 'Other: please specify'.
resultsThe number of completed responses was 377. Of the study participants, 58.6% (n=221) reported having experienced sexual harassment in the workplace at some point in their career. Rape was reported by 1.32% (n=5). Significant associations were seen between workplace sexual harassment and junior position and not having children (p<0.05). Only a few had filed formal complaints (0.9%, n=2). Reasons cited for lack of action were fear of not being taken seriously (63%), fear of tarnishing the reputation of self (54%) and fear of the perpetrator (37.8%). Perceived psychological responses included anger (80%), disappointment (50.6%) and shame (44.3%). Suicidal thoughts affected 2.7%, while 0.4% had attempted suicide. The majority responded 'yes' (33.4%) or 'maybe' (43.8%) to the question related to perception of lack of physical or sexual safety in the workplace. The most common reasons for feeling unsafe were lack of adequate privacy in on-call rooms, bathrooms and changing rooms (63.1%), inadequate safety measures such as lack of locks or proper doors (54.2%) and unavailability of chaperones when handling male patients (30.1%).
conclusionWorkplace sexual harassment is common but under-reported among female doctors in Sri Lanka and could result in adverse psychological effects. Apart from sociocultural enablers, there are modifiable environmental factors that are associated with it, and it is imperative that administrators take these factors into account for the improvement of workplace safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.