ArticleThe Journal of school health2026
Student Differences in a Social-Emotional Learning Program: Engagement and Individual Factors.
Article in The Journal of school health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis quality improvement project examined student engagement in a Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) program, analyzing how individual differences such as grade level, gender, and race/ethnicity impacted learning and motivation to use SEL skills.
methodPost-program surveys were collected from 981 middle and high school students. Three hierarchical regression models were used to analyze associations between engagement and outcomes: SEL knowledge learned, readiness to use skills, and intention to use skills.
resultsHigher engagement was significantly associated with knowledge learned in SEL skills, readiness and intention to use these skills across most groups. Gender-diverse students reported lower knowledge or intention than women. Racial/ethnic minority groups reported greater knowledge gains and higher motivation than white students. IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY: Continuous quality improvement of SEL curricula that consider students' engagement, developmental stages, and identities may enhance more equitable learning and participation.
conclusionsEngagement plays an important role in SEL learning and motivation, highlighting the value of developmentally informed approaches that are accessible and relevant to all learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.