ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Toward Free-Breathing Renal CEST MRI: Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Prospective Respiratory Triggering Approach.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEndogenous renal chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging enables contrast-agent-free assessment of renal metabolism but is highly sensitive to respiratory motion. Existing approaches, such as timed breathing, require high patient compliance or preclinical mechanical ventilation, limiting clinical translation. We evaluated a free-breathing prospective respiratory triggering method that allows continuous saturation during active breathing while adaptively aligning image acquisition with the expiratory phase.
methodsProspective triggering was based on a modified real-time respiratory signal, with a temporal shift continuously updated according to the current respiratory rate. Simulations assessed its performance across saturation durations of 1-6 s, respiratory rates representative of preclinical and clinical settings (f = 8-90 bpm), and varying respiratory frequency (CV = 0%-25%). Results were compared to conventional real-time triggering. For in vivo validation, prospective triggering was implemented on a preclinical 7 T MRI system using a Raspberry Pi-based hardware and software. Six mice underwent CEST imaging with saturation durations of 1, 3, and 5 s using both real-time and prospective triggering, and the Mean Squared Error of Lorentzian fit was used to compare the two approaches.
resultsThe real-time trigger error shows a periodic dependence on respiratory frequency, which diminishes with increasing variability, whereas the prospective trigger reduces this periodicity. In vivo, prospective triggering significantly (p < 0.05) reduced motion-induced scattering in the Z-spectrum for saturation times up to 3 s and enabled the detection of distinct metabolic contrasts across renal compartments.
conclusionProspective triggering effectively reduces motion artifacts in preclinical renal CEST imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.