ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Harnessing institutional knowledge: mixed methods evaluation of peer coaching in a multi-site EHR transition.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHealth systems undertaking electronic health record (EHR) transitions often struggle to prepare and support clinicians in learning and using the new system. We evaluated a national peer coaching program-the National EHRM Supplemental Staffing Unit (NESSU)-designed to support clinicians during the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA's) transition to a new EHR. Our goal was to assess NESSU's reach, perceived usefulness, and association with key EHR user outcomes, and to characterize how NESSU achieved its observed impacts. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing a convergent mixed-methods design, we surveyed EHR users at the most recent VA facility to implement the new EHR. Descriptive statistics summarized program reach and perceived helpfulness. Regression models assessed associations between NESSU participation and 3 outcomes: burnout, EHR-related stress, and EHR confidence. Qualitative data included 62 interviews with users and open-ended survey responses. We used structured coding and thematic analysis to identify themes.
resultsAmong 385 respondents, 58.4% reported receiving NESSU support and 83.6% of those rated it as helpful. NESSU participation was associated with lower rates of burnout (29% vs 41%, P = 0.016) but not with differences in EHR confidence or EHR-related stress. Qualitative analysis yielded 4 themes describing how NESSU functioned (filling education gaps, providing responsive support, offering expert guidance, and drawing upon notable interpersonal skills) and one theme describing its overall impact. DISCUSSION: Findings demonstrate that peer coaching can address important support needs during EHR transitions.
conclusionScalable, clinician-led peer coaching may represent an essential component of large-scale EHR transitions, supporting both implementation and clinician well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.