Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42143611›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia

Use of the Multidimensional Haemophilia Pain Questionnaire (MHPQ) in Patients With Severe Haemophilia A Treated With Emicizumab: A Pilot Cross-Sectional, Single-Centre Study.

Ilenia Lorenza Calcaterra, Sofia Donnarumma, Guido D'Errico, Carmine De Luca, Chiara Caputo, Paola Ciciola, Ernesto Cimino, Matteo Di Minno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ilenia Lorenza CalcaterraDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Reference Centre For Coagulation Disorders, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Sofia DonnarummaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Reference Centre For Coagulation Disorders, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Guido D'ErricoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Reference Centre For Coagulation Disorders, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Carmine De LucaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Reference Centre For Coagulation Disorders, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Chiara CaputoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Reference Centre For Coagulation Disorders, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Paola CiciolaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Reference Centre For Coagulation Disorders, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Ernesto CiminoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Reference Centre For Coagulation Disorders, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Matteo Di MinnoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Reference Centre For Coagulation Disorders, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite effective bleed prevention with Emicizumab, pain remains a relevant clinical burden in adults with severe haemophilia A (sHA). A multidimensional assessment is needed to better characterize contemporary haemophilia-related pain.

objectiveTo evaluate the prevalence, characteristics, and functional impact of pain in adults with sHA receiving Emicizumab prophylaxis using the Multidimensional Haemophilia Pain Questionnaire (MHPQ).

methodsIn this single-centre, cross-sectional pilot study, 27 adults with sHA on Emicizumab prophylaxis completed the MHPQ. Pain localization, frequency, triggering factors, intensity, and interference across life domains were assessed descriptively.

resultsLifetime haemophilia-related pain was reported by 85.2% of participants, and 77.8% experienced pain within the previous 12 months. Pain most frequently involved ankles (52.4%), knees (52.4%), and elbows (28.6%). All patients with recent pain reported pain during bleeding episodes; however, movement-related triggers, including accidental movements (66.7%) and physical activity (54.2%), were also common. Pain intensity was generally mild-to-moderate, with the highest median scores observed after accidental movements (median 4, IQR 2-6). Pain interfered predominantly with general activity (71.4%), walking ability (66.7%), mood (61.9%), and enjoyment of life (61.9%). Arthropathy was documented in 70.4% of patients.

conclusionsIn the non-factor prophylaxis era, pain remains prevalent and functionally relevant in adults with sHA despite effective bleed control. These findings suggest that haemophilia-related pain is not exclusively bleeding-driven and highlight the importance of structured, multidimensional pain assessment in routine haemophilia care.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHemophilia APainPain MeasurementAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAntibodies, BispecificAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedemicizumabarthropathychronic painEmicizumabhaemophilia AMHPQmultidimensional pain assessmentpain interferencepatient‐reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42143611
PMCPMC13378640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.