Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42143600›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2026

Pilot testing of a brief pre-consultation medicines adherence tool in a geriatric outpatient setting.

Jennifer M Stevenson, Massimo Pezzolato, Sarah Chapman, Aiman Ibrahim, Tae Ibrahim, Nabeel Syed, John A Weinman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer M StevensonKing's College London - Pharmacy Department, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5664-1737
Massimo PezzolatoApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Sarah ChapmanKing's College London - Pharmacy Department, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Aiman IbrahimKing's College London - GKT School of Medical Education, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Tae IbrahimKing's College London - GKT School of Medical Education, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Nabeel SyedGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust - Department of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
John A WeinmanKing's College London - Pharmacy Department, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn older adults, medication non-adherence is prevalent and harmful. Current methods of identification have limitations, with direct questioning often being met with a reluctance to 'admit' non-adherence to healthcare professionals. The Making Medicines Work for You (MMWFY) tool consists of seven items (mapped to recognised adherence barriers) and a free-text box, and has been developed to support patients and clinicians identify and discuss adherence issues in a clinical setting. This study piloted the tool in a geriatric outpatient population.

methodsPatients attending the Older Person' Assessment Unit at a London teaching hospital completed the MMWFY tool. Descriptive analysis was used to determine the incidence and type of potential adherence barriers. Associations and correlations between the tool and existing measures of adherence (MARS-5) and medicines beliefs (BMQ) were assessed.

resultsOf 245 patients approached, 226 consented to participate: 120 (53.1%) males; mean age 78 years. On the MMWFY, 115 (50.9%) participants selected at least one item (median 1, range 0-5), indicating the presence of a potential adherence barrier. 'I've found my own way to use my medicines' (n = 53, 27.5%) and 'I sometimes forget to take my medicines' (n = 45, 23.3%) were the most frequently selected. The tool demonstrated association and correlation with validated adherence measures.

conclusionHalf of the participants reported potential barriers to medication adherence. The high rate of completion and association with existing adherence measures suggest that the tool may have value in this setting. Further work is required to explore the barriers identified and how to use these to develop appropriate adherence support.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMedication AdherenceOutpatientsAdherence InterventionsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansLondonMalePilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnairesmedication adherenceolder adultsoutpatients

Identifiers

PMID42143600
PMCPMC13180272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.