Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42143546›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026

Being praised and criticized in adolescents and adults: Age-related changes in neural responses to social evaluations.

Qinyuan Chen, Sam Luc Bart Bonduelle, Guo-Rong Wu, Rudi De Raedt, Chris Baeken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qinyuan ChenGhent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: qinyuan.chen@ugent.be.
Sam Luc Bart BonduelleGhent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), University Hospital Brussels (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
Guo-Rong WuGhent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Rudi De RaedtDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Chris BaekenGhent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) lab, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Head and Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium; Neuroprotection and Neuromodulation Research Group (NEUR), Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a developmental period marked by heightened sensitivity to social evaluation due to the ongoing maturation of brain regions involved in emotion regulation and social cognition. Adolescents may be more vulnerable to socially evaluative feedback, particularly criticism, than adults. Although previous studies have documented age-related differences in neural responses to social evaluation, it remains unclear how the dynamic interactions among brain regions differ between these two age groups during social evaluation. In this study, sixty-four adolescents (14-17 years) and fifty-nine adults (20-40 years) were exposed to criticism, praise, and neutral comments during fMRI scanning. Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) was used to examine functional interactions among key brain regions involved in social evaluation: the right pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pgACC), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and left precuneus. Compared to adults, adolescents were more sensitive to criticism as they reported higher perceived criticism and more task-induced mood disturbance following criticism. DCM results showed that adolescents had stronger excitatory DLPFC-to-pgACC connectivity, and weaker excitatory pgACC-to-DLPFC and DLPFC-to-precuneus connectivity during social evaluation in general, compared to adults. Moreover, when being criticized, adolescents showed less excitation of the DLPFC-to-pgACC connectivity, whereas when being praised, they showed less inhibition of the pgACC-to-DLPFC connectivity. These findings highlight age-related differences in the neural dynamics underlying social evaluation processing, providing insight into adolescents' heightened sensitivity to social evaluation and potential risk for developing affective disorders.

Indexed as

BrainSocial CognitionSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBrain MappingEmotionsFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultAdolescenceCriticism sensitivityDynamic causal modellingFMRINeurodevelopmentSocial evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42143546
PMCPMC13200081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.