ArticleGlobalization and health2026
Improving health sector coordination for resilient healthcare systems: European lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Globalization and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of integrating the concepts of Public Health Emergency Preparedness and health system resilience, emphasizing the role of coordination across sectors, which is essential for ensuring that systems can respond effectively to public health threats and manage resources efficiently. This paper aims to summarize the lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic among European Union Member States, focusing on gaps and improvement areas within coordination of healthcare services.
methodsThe study analyzes the experience of Croatia, Finland, Germany, Italy, and Spain during the initial phase of the pandemic. These countries were selected for their diverse organizational structures and varying responses to COVID-19. The research involved literature reviews, analyses of pandemic preparedness plans, and interviews with national focal points and experts. Key areas of public health emergency capabilities were examined using the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Logic Model developed in 2017, with a particular focus on coordination of health services.
resultsThe analysis focused on four capabilities in the health services domain. Among them, coordination of population-based medicine emerged as a key element in integrating public health and primary care during pandemics and to ensure consistent and coherent response within the whole health system. Common challenges included organizational fragmentation and communication barriers, which hindered effective coordination across healthcare services.
conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic revealed, at national, regional and local levels, several gaps in coordination between hospitals, primary care, and public health services. At the same time, it provided lessons on measures that countries can implement to enhance Public Health Emergency Preparedness and thus resilience of health systems, for future health emergencies. By fostering collaboration between services and addressing systemic barriers, healthcare systems can enhance coordination and deliver high-quality, patient-centered care. More than anything, the pandemic underscored the importance of effective leadership and system adaptability strongly aligned with comprehensive emergency plans that clearly outline in advance tasks, responsibilities and procedures. Furthermore, creating effective communication channels and tools can significantly improve information exchange between healthcare providers and emergency responders, ensuring timely and efficient responses to emerging health threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.