ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Pediatric home-based hospice and palliative care: a scoping review.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatric palliative and/or hospice care is provided across a broad spectrum of settings, ranging from inpatient to outpatient to a child's home. Pediatric home-based hospice and/or palliative care teams offer a specialized, interdisciplinary approach to care, allowing children to stay in the home while offering comprehensive support. This scoping review seeks to summarize what is known about pediatric home-based hospice and/or palliative care and to identify gaps in the current research. Following Arskey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, we searched four databases for studies focused on pediatric home-based hospice and/or palliative care programs. Studies were included if they were published between 2000 and 2024, available in English, and focused on children and young adults receiving palliative or hospice care at home, including via telehealth, in the pediatric system. Of 2,552 results initially identified, 96 met our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Common themes emerged including studies analyzing models of care, characterizing the population, end-of-life decision making, clinical outcomes of home-based hospice and/or palliative care, costs and economic impact, family experiences, quality domains, specific treatment modalities, and the use of telehealth. Overall, the available literature supported home-based hospice and/or palliative care as an effective model of care, reducing the burden on families, improving quality of life, and allowing families to stay in their preferred setting for care without sacrificing clinical outcomes. Key research gaps included small sample sizes, limited use of control groups and scarcity of randomized clinical trials, difficulties including the perspective of the ill child in research, and a need for longitudinal studies on the effects of home-based hospice and/or palliative care on children and families. Given the compelling evidence for the benefits of pediatric home-based hospice and/or palliative care, further research into disparities in care access, best models of care, and novel payment models are critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.