ArticleBMC health services research2026
Rapid assessment of the implementation of national health insurance program in Nepal: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNepal's national health insurance program (NHIP) initiative, launched in 2016, endeavors to attain universal health coverage (UHC). However, it encounters significant hurdles in ensuring sufficient coverage across the population. Despite the remarkable progress it has made in improving access to health services, there are problems resulting into poor enrollment and retention and challenges regarding ensuring quality of care.
objectivesThis study aimed to assess the current implementation challenges of NHIP through consumer and providers perspectives and thereby identify the facilitators and barriers for enrollment in NHIP. METHODOLOGY: We conducted an exploratory qualitative research design and employed thematic analysis approach. A total of 22 health facilities across the 14 districts of 3 provinces of Nepal were included in the study. We conducted 62 key informant interviews with the providers and 39 focus group discussions with the community members to determine the factors impacting enrollment and retention to health insurance program. All the interviews were audio-recorded, translated and analyzed thematically using the WHO six-building blocks as a theoretical framework. The analysis was done in Excel.
resultsThe results are presented under the WHO six building blocks. The Health Insurance Board's (HIB) leadership lacks effectiveness due to the limited administrative delegation power held by provincial and local governments. The existing financing mechanism is viewed as unsustainable in the long term, highlighting the necessity for mandatory population enrollment. Poor awareness of the program and mistrust regarding care quality emerge as primary factors contributing to low enrollment and retention rates. Addressing these challenges requires urgent implementation of training and retention strategies for community-level enrollment assistants. Additionally, facility-based monitoring and supervision, currently lacking, could serve as a means to improve and rebuild trust in the quality of healthcare service.
conclusionWith rigorous monitoring and iterative approach, Nepal has a historic opportunity to create a model of success on universal health coverage in a low-income setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.