Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42143307›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Community voices to understand and promote liveability in the Green Corridor urban transformation project in Bogotá, Colombia.

Lina María Gómez-García, Elena Mª Gras-García, Eduardo De la Vega-Taboada, Nicolás Solórzano Duran, Abby C King, Zakaria Nadeem Doueiri, Jose Mario Mayorga, Carlos M Moncada, Luis A Guzman, Laura Mejía Riveros and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lina María Gómez-GarcíaSchool of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 N 18ª-12, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0428-7865
Elena Mª Gras-GarcíaSchool of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 N 18ª-12, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5605-226X
Eduardo De la Vega-TaboadaDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-8929
Nicolás Solórzano DuranSchool of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 N 18ª-12, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0007-5026-8936
Abby C KingDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7949-8811
Zakaria Nadeem DoueiriDepartment of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-4701-2353
Jose Mario MayorgaDepartment of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-0407
Carlos M MoncadaDepartment of Civil and Agricultural Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-6880
Luis A GuzmanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Grupo de Sostenibilidad Urbana y Regional SUR, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6487-7579
Laura Mejía RiverosSchool of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 N 18ª-12, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0000-2238-4496
Olga L SarmientoSchool of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 N 18ª-12, Bogotá, Colombia. osarmien@uniandes.edu.co.ORCID 0000-0002-9190-3568

Funding

Fondo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación of the Sistema General de Regalías, Colombia BPIN 2021000100275Fondo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación of the Sistema General de Regalías, Colombia BPIN 2021000100275 - Agreement 001 of 2022 with Universidad Nacional de ColombiaWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 227810/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLatin American cities are transforming in response to climate change, yet residents' liveability experiences before these transformations begin are rarely documented. In Bogotá, the 2022-2035 Land Use Master Plan's Green Corridors aim to promote sustainable mobility and integrate green infrastructure in urban design, with the first corridor planned along 7th Street. This study provides a baseline evaluation of liveability conditions along 7th Street before construction, aiming to (i) identify perceptions of social and built environment factors that facilitate or hinder liveability and (ii) document potential solutions to identified barriers.

methodsWe employed a multi-method approach. A cross-sectional household survey described residents' sociodemographic profile and perceptions of the Green Corridor's expected effects on liveability. The Our Voice citizen science method engaged residents and commuters in identifying perceived facilitators and barriers, proposing potential solutions, and exchanging knowledge with policymakers.

resultsResidents' most expected improvements included increased vegetation, pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, and public space upgrades, while the most anticipated deteriorations included difficulty in car use and worsening public transport operations. Through the Our Voice method, 66 citizen scientists captured 1123 photo-narratives, documenting access to essential services, green areas, and urban trees as the most mentioned facilitators, while poor pedestrian infrastructure and safety concerns as the most mentioned barriers. Proposed solutions included infrastructure improvements, educational campaigns, and evidence-based policymaking. The process increased environmental awareness among citizen scientists and supported knowledge exchange with policymakers.

conclusionThis study underscores the importance of grounding climate mitigation and adaptation efforts in baseline assessments of urban residents' liveability experiences. Built environment factors were widely valued as facilitators, while social environment factors emerged as persistent barriers, a pattern that the Our Voice method deepened by revealing the conditions that underpin these perceptions. The participatory process generated practical solutions, deepened citizen scientists' awareness of their surroundings, and enabled meaningful engagement with policymakers. As cities pursue climate goals, these findings offer a foundation for understanding and evaluating the effects of a Green Corridor on residents' everyday liveability as the intervention unfolds.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentCity PlanningEnvironment DesignAdultCitiesCitizen ScienceClimate ChangeColombiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCitizen scienceClimate change adaptationClimate change mitigationCommunity-based participatory researchLatin AmericaLiveabilityOur VoiceUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID42143307
PMCPMC13348599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.