ArticleBMC medical education2026
Factors associated with student success in objective structured clinical examinations and written exams.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObjective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are an increasingly popular method for assessing medical students, aiming to foster a curriculum that emphasizes the development of clinical skills during medical studies. This study aimed to identify the factors influencing student performance in both OSCEs and written exams to better understand students' needs and refine educational strategies. We hypothesized that the determinants of success may differ between these two modalities, which evaluate partly distinct competencies.
methodsA survey was conducted among fifth-year medical students from Université Paris Cité, collecting data on demographics, personal context, educational background, and exam preparation methods. Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate regression models to examine the association between student characteristics and mean grades in OSCEs and written exams.
resultsThe study involved 441 medical students, of whom 310 were women. Factors independently associated with better grades in written exams included the absence of concurrent professional activity, no previous repetition in the curriculum, regular attendance at faculty theory courses, use of reference textbooks, participation in private training conferences, and higher exposure to OSCEs during hospital rotations. For OSCE performance, better grades were independently associated with the subscription to online exam preparation platforms and attendance at private training conferences.
conclusionsOur findings reveal distinct factors influencing success in OSCEs compared to written exams. Targeted educational strategies, like encouraging OSCE practice during hospital rotations and supporting access to training conferences, may benefit students. A comprehensive understanding of student needs should extend beyond refining teaching strategies to include considerations like scholarship eligibility for students balancing professional work with their studies. These insights highlight the need for a holistic approach in medical education, addressing both academic and personal factors to fully support student achievement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.