ArticleBMC health services research2026
Requirements engineering-based mixed-methods needs assessment for a telemedicine breast cancer follow-up system.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBreast cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality among women worldwide. Telemedicine presents a promising pathway to improve cancer care delivery; however, structured approaches to systematically eliciting and integrating stakeholder requirements remain scarce. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive needs assessment using requirements engineering principles to inform the design of a telemedicine-based follow-up system for breast cancer patients.
methodsAn exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, encompassing five stages: requirements elicitation, data collection, data analysis, requirements validation, and use-case development. Data were collected from 41 stakeholders-including healthcare professionals, administrative staff, patients, and caregivers-using semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.
resultsThe analysis identified three key domains of requirements-organizational, system, and stakeholder. Organizational requirements underscored the importance of leadership support, sustainable funding, and comprehensive training. System requirements emphasized security, scalability, interoperability, and user-centered design. Stakeholder needs highlighted privacy protection, accessibility, and effective communication channels.
conclusionApplying a structured, stakeholder-driven requirements engineering approach enabled the identification of organizational, technical, and user needs essential for designing a telemedicine follow-up system for breast cancer. The developed framework provides a replicable model for implementing secure, scalable, and user-centered telemedicine solutions not only in oncology but also across other healthcare domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.