ArticleBMC neurology2026
A novel limited-dose C5 inhibitor add-on as rescue therapy for refractory NMOSD attacks: a practical alternative to conventional multi-dose regimens.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients with refractory attacks, despite standard therapy with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and plasma exchange (PLEX), often experience significant disability. While complement C5 inhibition has established efficacy in relapse prevention, its role in acute-phase management remains unclear.
methodsIn this single-center, retrospective case series, eight patients (6 AQP4-IgG seropositive, 2 seronegative) with acute NMOSD and suboptimal responses to IVMP ± PLEX were treated with 1-4 weekly doses of ECU (900 mg per dose). The primary outcome was the change in functional scores (EDSS for myelitis and logMAR visual acuity (VA) of the worse eye for optic neuritis) from pre-ECU baseline to 1 and 3 months post-ECU. The secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving good improvement, and safety.
resultsSix patients presented with severe, refractory attacks (median nadir EDSS/VA: 9.0/2.5) showing minimal response to conventional therapy (median post-IVMP/PLEX EDSS/VA: 8.75/2.5). The remaining two patients, while not meeting the criteria for a severe attack, also had an unsatisfactory response to first-line treatment. Add-on limited-dose ECU enhanced neurological function. In myelitis patients, the median EDSS score improved from 8.5 at baseline to 3.5 at 3 months. In optic neuritis patients, the median VA score improved from 1.9 to 0.5. The proportion of patients achieving good response increased from 42.9% at 1 month to 100% at 3 months. Both seronegative patients also responded favorably. The treatment regimen was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events other than anti-HBc seroconversion in one patient, highlighting the importance of infectious monitoring during complement inhibition.
conclusionsLimited-dose ECU appears to be an effective rescue therapy for accelerating recovery in refractory NMOSD attacks, including in seronegative patients, with a generally favorable safety profile. It represents a promising bridging strategy to long-term immunosuppression, addressing a critical unmet need in acute-phase NMOSD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.