ArticleBMC primary care2026
"Loops and hurdles": secondary analysis of patient interview data to explore the experience of patient access to UK general practice.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany countries are experiencing a shortage of general practitioners, increased demand for primary care, resulting in difficulties for patients seeking access and leading to increased dissatisfaction. The NHS Delivery Plan for Recovering Access to Primary Care in May 2023 signalled a UK policy commitment to improve GP access.
methodsTo explore patients' experience of access to UK general practice as reported in previously conducted interview studies of COVID and non-COVID related conditions a secondary analysis of interviews with 286 participants from five qualitative interview studies originally carried out between 2020 and 2023 was conducted. Qualitative thematic secondary analysis using a mix of deductive and inductive coding was used to examine interview data about patients' experiences of health conditions and health services.
resultsThe interview data reveal 'loops' and 'hurdles' experienced by patients which delay and complicate the process of accessing general practice. Obstacles to access included needing to phone back several times, using online triage systems and negotiating with receptionists. Some patients were able to develop strategies or had resources including time and knowledge of the health system that helped them overcome access barriers, but the overall picture is of difficult and often negative access experiences.
conclusionSecondary analysis of archived health experience interview data can provide additional evidence about access to care. Policy and practice solutions to access challenges increasingly rely on the use of phone and online systems of triage and for appointment making but these can increase delays and are experienced as significant barriers to access, fuelling dissatisfaction with primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.