ReviewCNS drugs2026
Enhancing Drug Response Prediction in Epilepsy with Emerging Multimodal Models: Focus on Clinical, Pharmacologic, and Genomic Factors.
Review in CNS drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, with approximately one-third of the affected population developing drug-resistant epilepsy despite the exponentially increasing number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) that are available. Current ASM selection remains largely empirical, lacking reliable biomarkers to predict treatment response. Pharmacogenomics is an important factor underlying drug response. The development of models designed to predict drug response in epilepsy that include genomic information is at an early stage. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) offer new opportunities for multimodality modelling and, in particular, models that can reason over both a patient's genomic risk factors and their clinical features (e.g. epilepsy type, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]/electroencephalography [EEG] findings). More broadly, new technologies are driving a paradigm shift towards agentic AI, whereby decision-support agents will coordinate medical information and propose actions. These advances have implications for individualised ASM prescribing in epilepsy. For example, rather than modelling thousands of genetic variants, a DL model can operate with compressed representations of data obtained from AI foundation models that have been trained on huge atlases to learn representations of general biology, enhancing capacity for small epilepsy cohorts. In this review, we summarise how emerging technologies are being harnessed and highlight strategies for building capacity. We specifically focus on clinical, pharmacological, and genomic data, discussing the ways in which drug information can be formatted to take advantage of DL model capabilities. We describe AI foundation models and provide examples of how they can be utilised in epilepsy research. We conclude with a summary of ongoing challenges, including model evaluation, data availability, ethical considerations, and barriers to clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.