ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Prognostic value of pretest probability of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease: an insight from the CLIDAS-PCI database.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major risk factor for the development of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and is associated with increased mortality. However, an optimal strategy to screen for HFpEF among patients with CAD has not yet been established. The HFpEF-ABA score was introduced to estimate the pretest probability of HFpEF and was shown to predict adverse HF events. This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients registered in the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System database who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from April 2013 to March 2019. Patients with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≥ 50% and no known history of HF were included. Age, body mass index, and a history of atrial fibrillation were used to calculate the HFpEF-ABA score, and patients were dichotomized at a 50% threshold for descriptive risk stratification. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and unplanned HF hospitalization. Among 3307 patients, those with high HFpEF-ABA scores were more likely to have hypertension, renal dysfunction, anemia, larger left atrial size, higher LV mass index, and elevated brain natriuretic peptide levels, consistent with an HFpEF phenotype. Over a median follow-up of 721 days, 275 patients experienced the primary endpoint. The HFpEF-ABA score was independently associated with the primary endpoint as both a continuous and a categorical variable (hazard ratio: 1.07 [95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.14], P = 0.043, and 1.37 [1.07-1.76], P = 0.015, respectively). The HFpEF-ABA score identifies CAD patients with an HFpEF phenotype and predicts adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.