Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42143187›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026

A missed synthesis from the 1930s: Teorell, Mayneord, and the origins of physiological PK-TGI modelling.

Hitesh B Mistry

Abstract readHistorical ArticleLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hitesh B MistryDivision of Pharmacy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. hitesh.mistry@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The historical origins of mechanistic pharmacokinetic–tumour growth inhibition (PK–TGI) modelling are usually located in the later twentieth century. However, many of the essential ideas were already present in the 1930s, although not brought together in a single formal framework. In 1937, Torsten Teorell published a physiological theory of drug absorption, distribution, and elimination based on transport across biological boundaries and exchange between anatomical spaces. Five years earlier, W. V. Mayneord showed that the growth of Jensen’s rat sarcoma was more naturally described on a linear dimension than on tumour volume and explained this behaviour mechanistically by assuming proliferation within a thin outer rim surrounding a necrotic core. Read together, these papers contain the key ingredients of a physiological PK–TGI model: Teorell provides the concentration–time function, C(t), and Mayneord provides a growth law expressed on tumour radius, dR/dt = g. The missing link is an effect term coupling exposure to inhibition of radial growth. In its simplest form, this yields dR/dt = g - ψ(C). This article is not intended as an exhaustive review. Rather, it argues that the 1930s should be recognised as a formative period in mechanistic biomedicine in which the conceptual foundations of physiological PK–TGI modelling were already available in print. Selected later examples are used only to show that, even when tumour growth is recast in exponential, Gompertzian, reaction-diffusion, agent-based, or modern semi-mechanistic PK–TGI language, the field repeatedly returns to the same central point: for a solid tumour, net growth is governed by the behaviour of a viable outer region rather than by the bulk alone.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeoplasmsPharmacokineticsAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.