Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42143178›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2026

Kullback-Leibler divergence in feature selection: a methodology for improved detection of heart valve disorders.

V H Preetha, C V Raghu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

V H Preetha *Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Calicut, Kerala, India. preetha_p220036ec@nitc.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7787-4554
C V Raghu *Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Calicut, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dimensionality reduction is crucial for the effective management of high-dimensional datasets, particularly in the healthcare industry. Feature selection identifies the most relevant attributes, reducing computational overhead and ensuring robust performance, especially in resource-constrained environments. This study introduces a Kullback-Leibler Divergence (KLD)-based feature selection method for heart sound analysis to diagnose valvular heart diseases. Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and mel spectrograms were extracted from the dataset as input features. The KLD was applied to identify the most informative features, which were subsequently validated using various classifiers. This approach resulted in an accuracy of 99% in diagnosing five distinct heart sounds, outperforming classifiers using the full feature set. The method prioritizes critical features, leading to improved performance across all evaluated classifiers. This endeavor also aims to classify heart sounds on an embedded platform, enabling the efficient analysis and accurate diagnosis of cardiovascular conditions. These findings highlight the potential of KLD-based feature selection for the real-time detection of heart valve disorders. By reducing the processing overhead while preserving classification accuracy, this approach supports the development of efficient, cost-effective edge-based tools, ultimately improving diagnostic precision and healthcare resource efficiency.

Indexed as

Heart Valve DiseasesAlgorithmsDimensionality ReductionHeart SoundsHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedFeature selectionKullback–Leibler divergenceMel frequency cepstral coefficientsMel spectrogramsValvular heart diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.