ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact of Indoor Environmental Quality on Student Behavior: A Case Study Using AI-Powered Computer Vision.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) factors in shaping student behavior and emotional states in the classroom, which have been observed as potentially diminishing performance, necessitates objective and continuous assessment to overcome the limitations of subjective methods. This study addressed this need by utilizing a case study approach. We deployed an AI-powered behavioral observation system to anonymously estimate aggregate student behavior metrics (Engagement, Attention, Interaction) in real-time, synchronized with data collected from a custom-built multi-sensor device monitoring IEQ factors, including temperature, humidity, equivalent carbon dioxide (eCO[Formula: see text]), total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs), air quality index (AQI), light variations, and oxygen volume (O[Formula: see text]). Comprehensive statistical and causality analyses included nonparametric correlations, Cross-Correlation Function (CCF) analyses to assess lagged effects, Time-Varying Granger Causality (TV-GC) tests, and categorical analysis with Chi-squared tests. The results revealed that thermal and humidity extremes correlate with increased behavioral volatility. Temperature is the most consistent predictor of student attention; Chi-squared and violin plot analyses demonstrated that attention levels are significantly higher at slightly lower temperatures, specifically below 30.9[Formula: see text]C, within the reported range [29.62 - 31.35[Formula: see text]C]. Besides, a significant association between humidity and attention was observed, although it was significant at the [Formula: see text] level rather than the more stringent [Formula: see text] threshold applied to core findings. Additionally, the study identified a critical TV-GC relationship between O[Formula: see text] volume and engagement, pinpointing specific causal bursts that global correlation measures failed to capture. Standard CCF analyses suggested that lower light levels may be associated with higher interaction levels; however, this pattern was not statistically significant after pre-whitening and bootstrapping the CCF, nor was it supported by the TV-GC analyses. These findings advocate for responsive, automated classroom systems that dynamically adjust IEQ parameters to synchronize with the temporal demands of the learning process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.