ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable multi-agent learning for adaptive terrorist network disruption.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disrupting terrorist networks remains a critical challenge for counter-crime units due to their adaptive, decentralized, and covert nature. Existing approaches provide valuable structural insights but often rely on static representations and do not capture the sequential and adversarial dynamics underlying real-world intervention processes. In this work, we propose an explainable, game-theoretic multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework for simulating and analyzing adaptive terrorist network disruption. We formulate the problem as a partially observable, sequential decision-making process between two agents: an attacker, representing a terrorist organization seeking to expand its operational or ideological influence, and a defender, modeling law enforcement entities tasked with disrupting influence and neutralizing key actors. The framework incorporates domain-informed reward functions that capture structural, behavioral, and resilience-related properties of networks, enabling both agents to learn policies through repeated interaction. A central contribution of this work is the integration of explainability into the learning framework, allowing the generation and quantitative evaluation of interpretable rationales for node-level intervention decisions. Rather than modeling the full complexity of radicalization processes, the proposed approach provides a stylized but tractable simulation environment for studying strategic interaction under uncertainty. Empirical evaluations on multiple real-world-inspired extremist network structures show that (i) disruption effectiveness improves with increasing intervention budget but exhibits non-monotonic and network-dependent behavior, (ii) outcomes are strongly shaped by attacker-defender strategy interactions rather than individual strategies alone, and (iii) learned policies produce consistent and structured explanation patterns that reveal underlying network vulnerabilities. These findings demonstrate that explainable MARL can provide actionable insights into adaptive intervention strategies and serve as a decision-support tool for intelligence-led policing in complex networked environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.