ArticleScientific reports2026
Design and implementation of a hybrid machine learning framework for predicting heart rate status.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-time accurate evaluation of heart rate status during physical activity is a critical requirement in physiological analysis, performance enhancement, and early warning systems for cardiovascular diseases. In this work, a lightweight hybrid machine learning model for classifying the status of heart rate during physical activities into normal and warning levels using a combination strategy of Multilayer Perceptron, Naïve Bayes, and K-Nearest Neighbors algorithms in a weighted voting-based ensemble model is presented. The model analyzes a set of physiological and environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, speed, incline, and activity time. Before embarking on model development, a thorough statistical analysis of available data was performed, which involved descriptive statistics, density analysis, normality tests using Shapiro-Wilk tests, and both parametric and non-parametric hypothesis tests to establish the discriminative power of all input variables in spite of non-normality. Every individual base classifier model was tested for performance using a fixed split of 70/15/15 for training, validation, and testing, and their respective strengths were tapped using a weighted voting mechanism based on relief factor analysis. The simulation outcome shows that the proposed ensemble classifier performs better than standalone classifiers in achieving an accuracy of up to 96.67%, an F1-score of 96.66%, and an MCC of 0.9354, which is a manifestation of excellent classification balance and statistical significance. The proposed system was also tested on an embedded system developed using an Arduino platform for real-time processing, and it achieved an accuracy of 90.83% and an MCC of 0.8167. The performance degradation is due to sensor noises and limited numerical precision in an embedded system. The proposed framework contributes to improving real-time heart rate monitoring by addressing computational constraints and enabling efficient deployment on embedded platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.