ArticleScientific reports2026
Application of a PSO-FAHP-based evaluation system for office chair design demand analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing studies on office chair evaluation often emphasize either general furniture attributes or isolated performance indicators, limiting their usefulness for systematic design decision-making. To address this issue, this study proposes a demand-oriented evaluation framework for office chair products by integrating particle swarm optimization (PSO) with the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Based on Maslow's hierarchy of needs, office chair user requirements were identified and organized using the KJ method to establish a hierarchical evaluation index system. FAHP was applied to determine criterion weights under fuzzy judgment conditions, and PSO was used to improve matrix consistency and weighting stability. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation was then conducted for four selected representative office chair alternatives. The results showed that safety requirements had the highest weight, followed by basic functional and engineering requirements, while aesthetic and innovation-related requirements were less important. Among the four alternatives, Design Case A obtained the highest score under the selected criteria, weights, evaluators, and scoring scale. The findings suggest that office chair evaluation depends primarily on lower-order requirements related to use, support, and reliability, rather than on higher-order experiential attributes. The proposed PSO-FAHP framework offers a practical method for office chair assessment and a structured basis for requirement-oriented design decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.