ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-objective scheduling optimization for linear megaprojects considering technological innovation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technological innovation plays a critical role in driving the progress of linear megaprojects, despite being characterized by uncertainty and longtime spans between demand generation and application. To effectively incorporate the expectations of technological innovation time (ET) into construction management, a multi-objective scheduling optimization model is proposed. This model treats duration, cost, and robustness as multi-objectives, using the Linear Scheduling Method (LSM), which is more suitable for linear projects. It incorporates ET as scattered buffers, predicted by the Graphic Evaluation and Review Technique (GERT) network planning method. An improved Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (I-NSGA3) heuristic algorithm is employed to obtain the solution. Furthermore, the advantages of the model are examined through algorithm comparison, and sensitivity analysis is conducted to investigate the impact of ET on multiple objectives, as well as to determine the ET threshold for ensuring an optimal scheduling plan. Finally, case studies are presented to illustrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed model. The study concludes that when the expected time for technological innovation is less than one-eighth of the duration limit, an optimal schedule that balances cost, time, and robustness can be achieved. However, when the expected time exceeds half of the duration limit, significant schedule delays occur with minimal cost changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.