ArticleScientific reports2026
Peristaltic flow of sutterby nanofluid in a stenosed artery with ciliated endothelium and wall roughness under hall and ion slip effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this dissertation, we examine the nonlinear peristaltic locomotion of a Sutterby nanofluid in the presence of a magnetic field from the exterior through a stenosed capillary with a ciliated endothelium lining and rough sidewalls. This study's impetus stems from the need for more accurate hemodynamic models that can explain how magnetohydrodynamic forces and geometric irregularities alter blood flow in narrow arterial segments. Nonlinear radiant heat, viscous dissipation, and heating by Joules, Brownian diffusion, thermophoretic transport, activation energy effects, and spreading microbes are all incorporated into a comprehensive mathematical framework. Arterial roughness is modeled using a function that varies with both axial position and time, enabling representation of dynamic wall deformations. The Homotopy Perturbation Procedure is used to estimate analytical solutions for the generated equations, and qualitative compliance with experiments is provided for validation. The findings demonstrate that when the roughness amplitude rises, the critical pumping velocity falls. Furthermore, longer cilia increase hydraulic resistance and decrease axial velocity, whereas more eccentric cilia result in larger forward transport and faster flow. The originality of this integrated strategy is the simultaneous presence of time-dependent roughness and ciliated-wall mechanics for the MHD-driven artery structure. It promotes optimised performance of healthcare diagnosis and therapy, as well as constitutes a useful and accurate predictor for the evaluation of haemodynamics in stenosed arteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.