Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42143079›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Realistic benchmark RBD360 dataset for quality assessment of random user generated 360° videos.

Manav Arun Mehta, Pramit Mazumdar, Kalyan Chatterjee, Sweta Dey, Mudassir Khan, Raja Shekar Kadurka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manav Arun MehtaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Vadodara, Gandhinagar, India.
Pramit MazumdarDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Vadodara, Gandhinagar, India.
Kalyan ChatterjeeDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Vadodara, Gandhinagar, India.
Sweta DeyDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India.
Mudassir KhanDepartment of Computer Science , College of Computer Science, Applied College Tanumah, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Raja Shekar KadurkaSenior Data Scientist, AmmaluIT, Long Island City, NY, USA, 11101. rajashekar562@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

User-generated 360° video content is becoming increasingly popular due to the availability of low-cost acquisition devices and its inherently immersive nature. To facilitate research and development in this area, we introduce RBD-360, a dataset designed explicitly for quality assessment of user-generated 360° videos that includes various distortions typical of non-professional settings. RBD-360 features a collection of randomly captured source videos across multiple categories, recorded in three different environments: indoor, outdoor during the day, and outdoor at night. The impaired video sequences are created using three standard codecs-H.264, H.265, and VP9 at varying bitrates and quantization parameters. To evaluate subjective video quality, we employed an HMD-based Modified Absolute Category Rating protocol, along with assessments from the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire. This helps capture time-dependent viewer discomfort according to ITU-T P.919 recommendations. We implement benchmark quality assessment metrics on the RBD-360 dataset and report the results. The dataset is publicly available for testing quality assessment models tailored for user-generated videos at https://github.com/manav2701/RBD-360 .

Indexed as

360° videosModified ACRQuality of Experience (QoE)User Generated Content (UGC)Video Quality Assessment (VQA)

Identifiers

PMID42143079
PMCPMC13376566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.