Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42143059›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Forecasting US land use through 2067 using multi-method projections applied to seven decades of USDA data.

Nasrin Alamdari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nasrin AlamdariCivil and Environmental Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32310, USA. nalamdari@fsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term land use projections are essential for food security planning, conservation policy, and sustainable development, yet forecasting frameworks applied to the complete historical record of United States land use remain absent from the literature. Here we present the first comprehensive forecasting analysis of the USDA Economic Research Service (ERS) Major Land Uses (MLU) dataset, which spans 1945 to 2017 across 16 temporal observations for the 48 contiguous states. We develop and compare three forecasting approaches: (1) a Markov chain transition probability model estimated from 15 consecutive period-pairs via constrained least squares; (2) Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)-selected parametric curve fitting among linear, quadratic, logistic, and exponential models; and (3) scenario-modified Markov projections representing business-as-usual (BAU), accelerated urbanization, and conservation pathways. Projections extend 50 years to 2067 with bootstrap-derived uncertainty bounds from 500 iterations. Under BAU, cropland is projected to decline from 20.6% to 17.1% of total land area, forest-use land from 28.0% to 19.3%, while grassland pasture and range increases from 34.8% to 39.8% and special uses from 9.0% to 12.6%. AIC model selection independently identifies logistic saturation curves as the best-fitting model for cropland, forest, and urban land, providing convergent evidence that these major transitions are approaching asymptotic equilibria rather than continuing linearly. Under accelerated urbanization, urban land reaches 6.5% by 2067 with correspondingly greater losses in cropland and forest. State-level Markov models reveal convergence half-lives ranging from 5 to 15 years, demonstrating that the U.S. land use transformation is geographically asynchronous. The proposed framework leverages publicly available census-based tabular data and is designed to complement, rather than replace, remote sensing approaches; it can be readily adapted to any country that maintains periodic census-based or survey-based land use inventories, particularly in contexts where high-frequency national accounting over multi-decadal periods is required.

Indexed as

Bootstrap uncertaintyCropland lossLand use forecastingMarkov chainScenario analysisSteady-state equilibriumTransition probabilityUrban expansionUSDA Major Land Uses

Identifiers

PMID42143059
PMCPMC13369976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.