ArticleNature communications2026
Aberration-aware 3D localization microscopy via self-supervised neural-physics learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aberration-aware 3D localization microscopy via self-supervised neural-physics learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) enables volumetric nanoscopy by retrieving 3D molecular positions from engineered 2D fluorescence patterns. However, achieving nanoscale resolution over large axial ranges in complex samples remains challenging due to optical aberrations and overlapping signals from high-density molecules. Here, we introduce LUNAR, a self-supervised neural-physics framework that overcomes those limitations by jointly optimizing a physical imaging model and a deep neural network. This strategy allows LUNAR to precisely infer 3D molecular positions, photon counts, and aberrations directly from raw, high-density data without prior calibration. Through simulations and experiments, we demonstrate that LUNAR achieves superior robustness and accuracy across diverse imaging conditions, consistently outperforming existing methods. We showcase its capabilities through whole-cell nanoscopy of mitochondria, nuclear pores, and neuronal cytoskeletons at large imaging depths. By uniting deep learning with physical modeling, LUNAR provides a calibration-free solution for aberration-robust 3D SMLM and establishes a general framework for adaptive, data-driven microscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.