Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42142739›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2026

Assessing the responsiveness of musculoskeletal tissues to protein supplementation in vivo in older adults: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.

Dion Cj Houtvast, Floris K Hendriks, Michelle Eg Weijzen, Antoine H Zorenc, Joey Sj Smeets, Pieter J Emans, Will Kwh Wodzig, Mads S Larsen, Ulla R Mikkelsen, Martijn Gm Schotanus and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03037294 (Protein Turnover in the Osteoarthritic Knee; the Impact of Preoperative Protein Intake and Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03037294 nacompletednot on this map

Protein Turnover in the Osteoarthritic Knee; the Impact of Preoperative Protein Intake and Intra-articular Corticosteroid Injections

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2017 to 2024Enrolled27ConditionsOsteo Arthritis Knee, Protein MetabolismArmsPreoperative protein supplementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Dion Cj HoutvastDepartment of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Floris K HendriksDepartment of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Michelle Eg WeijzenDepartment of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Antoine H ZorencDepartment of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joey Sj SmeetsDepartment of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pieter J EmansDepartment of Orthopaedics, Joint Preserving Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Will Kwh WodzigCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mads S LarsenArla Foods Ingredients Group P/S, Viby J, Denmark.
Ulla R MikkelsenArla Foods Ingredients Group P/S, Viby J, Denmark.
Martijn Gm SchotanusDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Bert BoonenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen Mj van MulkenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Laurentius Ziekenhuis, Roermond, The Netherlands.
Peter Aj de LeeuwDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands.
Mireille Fm van StijnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Keith BaarDepartment of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States; Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Luc Jc van LoonDepartment of Human Biology, Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: l.vanloon@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough muscle protein turnover rates have been well established, little is known regarding the turnover of other musculoskeletal tissues. Furthermore, their response to protein supplementation has not yet been assessed.

objectivesTo assess skeletal muscle, bone, cartilage, tendon, ligament, meniscus, and periarticular soft tissue protein synthesis rates over a 2-wk period with or without additional protein supplementation in vivo in older adults.

methodsTwenty-four otherwise healthy older adults (12M/12F; age: 68 ± 7 y; body mass index: 29 ± 5 kg/m

resultsDaily fractional protein synthesis rates (FSRs) in muscle, synovium, and Hoffa's fat pad averaged 1.17 ± 0.23, 0.79 ± 0.46, and 0.53 ± 0.29%/d, respectively. Fibrous tissues, including anterior and posterior cruciate ligament, patellar tendon, lateral and medial meniscus, and femoral cartilage FSRs averaged 0.45 ± 0.27, 0.46 ± 0.32, 0.20 ± 0.10, 0.21 ± 0.15, 0.18 ± 0.14, and 0.19 ± 0.11%/d, respectively. Finally, FSRs of bone obtained from the distal femur, notch, trochlea, tibia, and patella were 0.18 ± 0.13, 0.21 ± 0.14, 0.13 ± 0.10, 0.12 ± 0.05, and 0.16 ± 0.10%/d, respectively. FSR differed significantly between tissue groups (P-tissue group < 0.001), with the highest FSR in muscle, followed by periarticular soft tissues, fibrous tissues, and bone (pairwise comparisons, all P < 0.001). Musculoskeletal tissue FSR did not differ between the control and protein supplemented group (P-treatment = 0.27, P-treatment∗tissue type = 0.14).

conclusionsMuscle, bone, cartilage, tendon, ligament, meniscus, and periarticular soft tissue protein synthesis rates range between 0.12 and 1.17% per day in vivo in older adults. Two weeks of protein supplementation does not seem to increase daily musculoskeletal tissue turnover. This trial was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov as NCT03037294.

Indexed as

Dietary ProteinsDietary SupplementsMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalWhey ProteinsAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone and BonesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProtein BiosynthesisDietary ProteinsMuscle ProteinsWhey Proteinscollagendeuterated waterheavy waterlabeled watermusculoskeletal systemprotein turnoverstable isotopestracers

Identifiers

PMID42142739
PMCPMC13494203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.