ArticleJournal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine
Tongue coating, severity of Ama, and disease activity in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A pilot study.
Article in Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTongue examination has been documented in Ayurveda and other medical systems. The severity of tongue coating (TC), an indicator of Ama in Ayurveda, can be clinically assessed by the Winkel tongue coating index (WTCI) through the analysis of smartphone images. This pilot study examines the relationship between TC and disease severity, as well as TC and Ama severity, in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), a prototype of Amavata. MATERIALS AND
methodsConsecutive outpatients suffering from RA (diagnosed as per ACR/EULAR criteria, 2010) were divided into two groups- Group A: Treatment naïve patients with active disease, and Group B: patients on treatment in remission as determined by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). The Ama-severity in these subjects was assessed by a validated Ama-instrument. A photograph of the tongue obtained by a smartphone was selected, edited, and marked into sextants for WTCI assessment. These photographs were randomized and submitted for TC analysis to five expert clinicians. Eleven images in each group could be analysed by all assessors. The clinical records of the respective patients were used for statistical analysis (GraphPad InStat Version 3.6 software).
resultsTwenty-two cases, 11 with active, untreated RA (Group A), and 11 in remission (Group B), were studied. All patients were females except one. Patients in Group A were older, less educated, and had a lower BMI than those in Group B. There was moderate inter-rater agreement (0.76 in Group A and 0.73 in Group B). There was no significant correlation between CDAI and WTCI (Spearman r = -0.08356, P = 0.7116, 95 % CI = -0.4981 - 0.3621) as well as between Ama Score and WTCI (Spearman r = - 0.1608, P = 0.4748, 95 % CI = -0.5548 - 0.2921). However, the Bonferroni correction indicated a statistically significant association between WTCI and the Ama-score. Moreover, the Friedman test revealed maximum coating in the posterior-middle area (area B, Fr = 57.728; P = < 0.0001, 95 % CI 1.645 to 1.937). Also, a moderately positive correlation between the TC score in area B and Ama-score (Spearman r = 0.4790, P = 0.0241, 95 % CI = 0.05858-0.7551) as well as between TC Score in area B and CDAI (r = 0.4393, P = 0.0408, 95 % CI = 0.008332 to 0.7327) was observed.
conclusionThis pilot study indicates that there is a positive association between WTCI and Ama-score in Amavata (RA). A moderately positive correlation between the severity of TC in the posterior-middle area and the severity of Ama in Amavata (RA) implies a careful examination of the posterior tongue in these patients. The inter-observer reliability was moderate during this study. Studies with a larger sample size are recommended based on observations of this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.