ArticlePsychological research2026
From internal timing to external clock-checking: the impact of ego depletion on dual-path attention in TBPM and the precise remediation by reminders.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ego depletion refers to a temporary state of resource exhaustion that occurs after an individual excessively utilizes their limited self-control resources. As a result, performance on subsequent cognitive tasks, including prospective memory (PM), may be impaired. The present study examined how ego depletion influences time-based prospective memory (TBPM) across two experiments. In Experiment 1, 164 participants (aged 18-25, M = 21.09, SD = 1.24) were assigned to a low-difficulty control group (N = 44), a high-difficulty control group (N = 41), a low-difficulty depletion group (N = 37), or a high-difficulty depletion group (N = 42). Results showed that ego depletion impaired TBPM performance, and this effect was not moderated by task difficulty. The impairment appeared to result primarily from reduced effectiveness of both internal and external attention. Experiment 2 investigated whether reminders could ameliorate TBPM deficits following depletion. Seventy-six participants (aged 18-25, M = 22.50, SD = 1.09) were assigned to a control group (N = 24), a recent reminder group (N = 26), or a distant reminder group (N = 26). Results indicated that recent reminders significantly improved TBPM performance, suggesting that explicit cues can markedly enhance prospective memory under ego-depletion conditions. This finding provides a low-cost and highly efficient cognitive strategy for contexts characterized by high cognitive load and low motivation (e.g., intensive work, learning, or clinical rehabilitation training). By optimizing the design of external cues, such strategies can help individuals maintain effective goal-directed task performance even when self-control resources are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42142255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.