ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Disrupting the CBFβ-SMMHC-RUNX1 oncogenic protein-protein interaction in inv(16) AML: from fusion biology to targeted therapy.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of liquid biopsy in the multimodal assessment and treatment of esophageal cancer: a surgical perspective.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Core-binding factor (CBF) leukemias, including inv(16) AML, involve RUNX1/CBFβ chromosomal rearrangements that generate oncogenic fusion proteins. In inv(16) AML, the CBFβ-SMMHC fusion (CBFB-MYH11) dominantly perturbs RUNX1 by sequestering it in aberrant, high-affinity complexes. Structural studies reveal that CBFβ-SMMHC binds the RUNX1 Runt domain with higher affinity than wild-type CBFβ, aided by a second RUNX1-binding site in its SMMHC tail. This altered interface underlies the fusion's dominant-negative disruption of RUNX1 target-gene regulation. Chemical probes have been developed to disrupt this interface; notably, the bivalent inhibitor AI-10-49 selectively binds CBFβ-SMMHC, displacing RUNX1 and restoring RUNX1 transcriptional function. AI-10-49 delays leukemia progression in murine inv(16) models and induces apoptosis in human inv(16) AML cells. Mechanistically, uncoupling RUNX1 from CBFβ-SMMHC liberates RUNX1 to repress oncogenic programs: for example, RUNX1 rebinds distal MYC enhancers and recruits polycomb factors (RING1B) in place of SWI/SNF (BRG1) to silence MYC, triggering leukemia cell apoptosis. These chromatin and transcriptional consequences underscore how CBFβ-SMMHC sustains leukemic transcriptional programs. Importantly, combining CBFβ-SMMHC inhibitors with BET bromodomain inhibitors synergistically eradicates inv(16) leukemia in preclinical models. Together, these insights into the structural basis and functional role of the CBFβ-SMMHC-RUNX1 interface highlight protein-protein interaction disruption as a promising translational strategy in core-binding factor leukemia therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.