SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Should checkpoint inhibitors be reserved for biomarker-selected pediatric brain tumors?
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePediatric brain tumors, including high-grade gliomas (HHG), medulloblastomas (MB), and ependymomas (EPN), are a leading cause of death in children. They are often immunologically "cold" with low tumor mutational burden (TMB) and very few tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which may limit the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
methodsWe performed a PRISMA‑guided systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from inception to September 17, 2025, for English-language studies of patients ≤ 21 years with primary CNS tumors treated with PD‑1/PD‑L1 or CTLA‑4 inhibitors. Eligible reports included prospective trials, retrospective series, and observational/case reports with extractable data on efficacy and/or toxicity. Of 479 records identified, 386 unique citations were screened, 127 underwent full‑text review, and 40 met inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis.
resultsProspective and institutional studies in biomarker-unselected diffuse midline glioma, high-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, and ependymoma showed low objective response rates (generally ≤ 6%), short median progression-free survival (1-3 months), and overall survival similar to historical controls, despite acceptable safety (grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events ~ 15-25% with anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4). In contrast, across germline MMR-deficient and broader RRD/hypermutant cohorts, PD-1 blockade produced clinically meaningful and sometimes durable responses, including complete remissions in malignant glioma and approximate 2-year overall survival near 50%, often with delayed responses and pseudoprogression. Histology-specific profiling highlighted marked variation in immune contexture: pediatric gliomas segregate into immune "hot," "altered," and "cold" subtypes; medulloblastoma is largely PD-L1-low with prominent B7-H3 and myeloid programs; checkpoint expression is also observed in germ cell and selected sellar tumors. Evidence quality is limited by small, heterogeneous, predominantly non-comparative designs.
conclusionICIs show manageable safety but limited efficacy in unselected pediatric CNS tumors. Durable benefit is most evident in RRD/hypermutant biology and possibly PD-L1-high niches (e.g., some low-grade gliomas and CNS-GCT). Future trials should be biomarker-driven and pair ICIs with priming combinations (e.g., radiation, epigenetic modulators, metronomic chemotherapy) to convert "cold" tumors into responders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.