ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Neuromuscular contributions to inter-limb quadriceps strength asymmetries across contraction types in healthy adults.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the contribution of neuromuscular mechanisms to quadriceps strength asymmetry across isometric, concentric, and eccentric contractions by examining the covariation between strength asymmetry and asymmetries in voluntary activation and doublet-evoked torque.
methodsFifteen healthy participants performed maximal isometric and anisometric contractions (30°/s) of both lower limbs on an isokinetic dynamometer. Side-to-side differences in torque, electromyographic (EMG) activity, voluntary activation, and doublet-evoked torque were assessed by comparing the stronger and weaker limbs. Associations between asymmetries in torque, voluntary activation, and doublet-evoked torque were subsequently examined.
resultsA significant difference between the stronger and weaker limbs was observed for torque across all contraction types (162.1 and 145.6 N.m, respectively), whereas no between-limb differences were found for neuromuscular parameters. Covariation analyses indicated that asymmetries in activation level (estimate = 0.57, p < 0.001) and doublet-evoked torque (estimate = 0.29, p = 0.006) were significant predictors of torque asymmetry, together explaining 29% of its variance (Marginal R²). In contrast, these relationships were not influenced by contraction type (p = 0.670).
conclusionIn healthy individuals, strength asymmetries covary positively with neuromuscular asymmetries. Given the absence of contraction-type effects, findings derived from isometric conditions likely generalize to anisometric contractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.