Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42142119›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026

Greenness and sustainability of common biosolvents in analytical chemistry.

Elefteria Psillakis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elefteria PsillakisLaboratory of Aquatic Chemistry, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Polytechnioupolis, 73100, Chania, Crete, Greece. elia@enveng.tuc.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5867-3940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solvents derived from renewable biomass are often viewed as inherently greener and more sustainable alternatives to petrochemicals. However, their bio-origin does not always guarantee these attributes, as they can still be energy-intensive to produce, toxic, and poorly biodegradable, with enduring trade-offs related to land competition, resource use, and technological maturity. This contribution critically examines selected commercial biosolvents for which sufficient life cycle data are available and underscores the need to verify green claims on solvents through a life cycle approach. It further challenges the assumption that structurally identical bio-based solvents are inherently greener, demonstrating that upstream environmental impacts may still occur. Common neoteric solvents, such as ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents, are also examined, highlighting the importance of measuring unresolved environmental and toxicological data. Furthermore, water, often proposed as a green solvent due to its abundance and ability to dissolve many substances, is discussed, with attention to the challenges associated with its disposal. Ultimately, this article is a call to fill the critical knowledge gap in life cycle solvent data and emphasizes that solvent greenness and sustainability cannot be presumed. Instead, they require a holistic approach that moves beyond reliance on simplified green narratives and integrates rigorous life cycle assessment, ethical feedstock sourcing, and economic viability.

Indexed as

Bio-based solventsGreen analytical chemistryLife cycle thinkingSustainability

Identifiers

PMID42142119
PMCPMC13542001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.